Q&A: Which of the following is not an environmental consequence of using fossil fuels?
Question by Dina: Which of the following is not an environmental consequence of utilizing fossil fuels?
Which of the following is not an environmental consequence of using fossil fuels?
A. A throughout the world infrastructure extracts, processes, and transports fossil fuels.
B. Wildlife habits can be disturbed when fossil fuels are extracted.
C. Chemical byproducts from burning fossil fuels can trigger air pollution.
D. Burning fossil fuels can release greenhouse gases into the environment, which contribute to worldwide warming.
Very best solution:
Remedy by Piscespets
Include your very own solution in the responses!
- Fenstermaker Environmental News – Misconceptions About Air Permitting Can Cost Companies More Than Money
- Metcam Sends 100 Employees to FABTECH This Week and Presents Educational Session on Reducing Environmental Footprint
- Crains Detroit Names PM Environmental Cool Place to Work in Michigan
- US Federal Contractor Registration: Air Force Pre-Solicitation Posted to FedBizOpps for Environmental Booths at Tinker AFB, Oklahoma
- Environmental laws in LOUISIANA
- Greenberg Traurig Hosts Environmental and Energy Post-Election Implications Webinar
- Specialty Technical Publishers and AECOM Publish Environmental, Health & Safety (EHS) Audit Protocol for the Russian Federation
- Automotive Expert and Car-Talk Host Bobby Likis Shares the Mic with Geoff Cooper, Senior Vice President of the Renewable Fuels Association
- PM Environmental Named Primary Contractor for $400,000 Brownfields Assessment Grant in Grand Rapids
- One in Five Businesses Admit to Increased Paper Use, Despite Environmental Concerns, Says New AIIM Report